Judge Honorable Enrique Romero, found, Plaintiff’s primary expert, DAVID R. SANNES (who labels himself a construction engineer w/o benefit of Calif. Engineer license), testimony to be “UNBELIEVABLE, EXAGGERATED, FANTASTICAL, UNREAL, INVENTED, FICTIONAL AND UNTRUSTWORTHY.” ‘A DOG AND PONY’ SHOW WITH NO SUBSTANCE Note: Judge Romero obviously a highly intellectual person could see through the delusional and illusional “blah” “blah” “blah” testimony as all hot air and not substance. Case Title: Hoang, Pltf. V. Pardee Homes, Defendant - Demand for $1,793,000.00 Pltfs. Counsel: Edward C. Ip & David Sire. Jr. Type of incident/Cause: Negligence/construction defect, morphed into general construction defect claim regarding mold and allegations that every aspect of construction was illegal & improper. VERDICT: DEFENSE (Hoang) TAKE NOTHING – Trial length/cost to taxpayers OVER 1 year of motion hearings- SEE BELOW website describing Sannes. www.sddl.org/sddlupdate/SDDL%202010%20Winter%20Final.pdf
The Arbitrator found Claimant's primary expert, David R. Sannes' testimony to be "unbelievable, exaggerated, fantastical, unreal, invented, fictional and ... www.sddl.org/sddlupdate/SDDL%202010%20Winter%20Final.pdf
Judge Honorable Enrique Romero, found, Plaintiff’s primary expert, DAVID R. SANNES (who labels himself a construction engineer w/o benefit of Calif. Engineer license), testimony to be “UNBELIEVABLE, EXAGGERATED, FANTASTICAL, UNREAL, INVENTED, FICTIONAL AND UNTRUSTWORTHY.” ‘A DOG AND PONY’ SHOW WITH NO SUBSTANCE Note: Judge Romero obviously a highly intellectual person could see through the delusional and illusional “blah” “blah” “blah” testimony as all hot air and not substance.
ReplyDeleteCase Title: Hoang, Pltf. V. Pardee Homes, Defendant - Demand for $1,793,000.00
Pltfs. Counsel: Edward C. Ip & David Sire. Jr.
Type of incident/Cause: Negligence/construction defect, morphed into general construction defect claim regarding mold and allegations that every aspect of construction was illegal & improper.
VERDICT: DEFENSE (Hoang) TAKE NOTHING – Trial length/cost to taxpayers OVER 1 year of motion hearings- SEE BELOW website describing Sannes.
www.sddl.org/sddlupdate/SDDL%202010%20Winter%20Final.pdf
LOOK IT UP!
ReplyDeleteThe Arbitrator found Claimant's primary expert, David R. Sannes' testimony to be "unbelievable, exaggerated, fantastical, unreal, invented, fictional and ...
www.sddl.org/sddlupdate/SDDL%202010%20Winter%20Final.pdf