The History of the Dark Matter Motor

Einstein, in 1917, mathematically calculated that a heretofore totally unknown entity, dark energy, had to permeate the universe. Why? Because dark energy had to be omnipresent in the universe, as a lambda notation, in order to make the mathematics of his general relativity theory coherent.

As I would describe it, the compulsive force of gravity had to be balanced by the equal and opposite repulsive force of dark energy. Why? Because Einstein's postulation of a cosmological constant (a force that opposes gravity and keeps the universe from collapsing) would maintain the then consensus belief that the universe was static and eternal.

Then Hubble discovered that the "Nebula" Andromeda was not just an interstellar cloud of dust and gas, in the Milky Way. It was another, and second, galaxy – started to create doubts. Then Hubble discovered that the universe is expanding, and that really caused trouble.

Andromeda and the Milky Way were just two of a great number of galaxies (that, at the time of this paper, number more than 1,453,000,000). So, in 1928, Einstein repudiated his own dark energy cosmological constant.

By 1960, I concluded that Einstein's "biggest blunder" was to denounce his cosmological constant. Of course, I was just then a high school student, a dairy farmer and a part-time goat herder.

Notwithstanding that truth, there was a huge obvious truth – the mathematics of Einstein's general relativity were not coherent, absent the repulsive force of dark energy. So, like any other eclecticist autodidact, I decided to solve Einstein's problems with the mathematics of general relativity.

Since I was oblivious to the enormity of this task that I had set for myself, I set out with complete confidence to discern if anyone, other than Einstein, had concluded that "dark energy" existed in the universe.

Less that 1,000 hours of mind-boggling work later, I had found the 1933 work of Fritz Swicky. Swicky (utilizing the 103 inch Hooker Telescope on Mount Wilson – which was then under the control of Edwin Hubble) had studied a local group of galaxies. Swicky concluded that this local group of galaxies was rotating around the center of the galaxy at a speed many more times than was dictated by their observable masses, according to the then accepted principles of physics and astronomy. Swicky postulated that this "missing" mass had to be composed of "dark matter."

Swicky's work fascinated me because he had also developed superior bomb-making materials for the military forces of the United States. I, of course, as a bomb-maker since the age of 12, tended to endorse Swicky's "dark matter" conclusions.

My research into the "dark matter' conclusions of Swicky also led me to the conclusion that Einstein never adopted the conclusions of Swicky before his death in 1955. I also noted that many of Swicky's colleagues judged him to be mentally unstable.

Then I found that the astronomer, Jan Oort, had also concluded that the orbital velocities of stars in the Milky Way did not decrease (in accordance with Keplerian rules of motion) as they were located at increasing distances from the center of our galaxy. But, as I recall, his results simply led Oort to conclude that his observational discrepancies would be rectified by future developments in astronomy.

After this uncontradicted research, I made it my working hypothesis that the dark energy of Einstein, the dark matter of Swicky and the dark matter of Oort were consistent and reliable.

My working conclusion was that: 1) there was a reason that the orbital velocities of stars did not decrease (in accordance with Keplerian rules of motion) as they were located at increasing distances from the center of the Milky Way galaxy; 2) the "Schwarzschild Solution" just furnished increasingly closer approximations of an actual precise mathematical solution, which has yet to be discovered. I believe that the Skyler particle that I have postulated in my Theory Of Everything will lead to the calculations that eliminate the need for the " Schwarzschild Solution"; 3) as Einstein had postulated that light was carried by a particle, so was the repulsive "dark energy" that he mathematically derived in 1917, as the counterbalance to the force of centrifugal gravity throughout the universe; 4) this repulsive centrifugal force that balances both Newtonian gravity and "attraction unique to general relativity" had to be composed of a particle and a wave. That particle and wave I have named the Skyler Particle/Wave; and 5) I had found why the mathematics of general relativity do not make sense at a quantum level.

I eventually had created conclusive evidence by creating the dark matter motor/generator prototype machine.

I then turned to the study of everyone involved in electricity and magnetism. Before I volunteered to serve in the U.S. Army in 1965, I had exhaustively studied the nature and source of compulsive and repulsive forces of permanent magnets. I scoured every scientific reference to the source of the energy of permanent magnets. My work just obtained completely unsatisfactory results. My favorite words about this research came from a physics textbook, coauthored by a Nobel Prize winning physicist, who wrote: "The permanent magnet is the source of energy of a unique kind."

In February, 1968, I returned from three combat tours in Vietnam for the U.S. Army and the National Security Agency. On February 17, 1968, I was hired by Boeing as an aeronautical engineer in Boeing's multi-disciplined engineering group of last resort.

I was named Boeing's engineer of the month, for February, 1968.

Within seven months of being hired by Boeing, I reported only to a committee of Boeing's board of directors, and to Malcolm Stamper, Boeing's CEO, and was being paid an outrageous sum of money.

In 1969, I solved the problem of utilizing weak electromagnets to alternatively combine with powerful permanent magnets, in rotary and piston configurations, to multiply the input energy as output energy, and work.

So, in 1969, I first contacted one of Seattle's finest intellectual property lawyers, Richard Seed. Mr. Seed believed in my dark matter motor/generator concepts, but he told me that
I would play hell in selling my inventions, because they defied many of the most famous laws of accepted science.

Richard Seed arranged a meeting for me, with a man whose inventive genius created the frozen food aisles.

Richard Seed arranged for me to talk with a successful inventor, Edward Maher. Mr. Maher had spent a lot of years of study and work before he sold his first invention, fish sticks. Maher graduated from Harvard with a degree in chemistry. He worked for General Foods. Fish sticks are lightly battered, cooked, partially dehydrated, flash frozen food – that kept its spices fresh by preserving them in butter. The cell walls of the fish were not mush, when thawed out by pan frying, because of the partial dehydration. Maher's work led to the huge frozen food sections in supermarkets today.

Mr. Maher told me that after the success of fish sticks, he got countless offers to make money.

Early in 1970, my scientific research, and my building design and construction work, were interrupted. Just before I had completed work on the District, a very large nightclub, a few blocks from the University of Washington, a powerful bomb exploded at a post office a few blocks away.

As a former senior counterintelligence agent back from bomb building work in Vietnam, I decided to solve the bombing mystery and bring the bombers to justice.

Meantime, in the early 1970's, Vera Rubin, of the Carnegie Institute, was telescopically observing and plotting the velocity of stars. Rubin found that velocities of stars did not decrease with increasing distance from galactic centers. Her work defied the Keplerian motion previously proven by all earlier astronomers, except for Swicky and Oort.

Rubin's star velocity plots demonstrated that the 60 or so stars, whose speed she plotted, did not exhibit speed decreases inversely proportional to the square root of radius distances – as required by Newton's law of gravity, and Kepler's Laws.

In 1974, Rubin's definitively plotted observation of stars' speeds led her to examine the telescopic observations and conclusions of Fritz Swicky in 1933. Vera Rubin, as of this date, has not publicly argued against the conclusion of dark matter proposed by Swicky.

Also, in 1974, Peebles and Ostriker, at Princeton University, had published a theoretical argument for the presence of dark matter in the universe.

Thus, Einstein, Swicky, Oort, Rubin, Peebles and Ostriker all had inadvertently brought dark energy and dark matter to the forefront of astrophysical research.

In 1981 and 1982, the actual construction and preliminary testing of my prototype dark matter motor proved that my 5 collaborators and myself had tapped what Tesla called: "the very wheelhouse of the universe."

My collaborators and I ran out of money, in early 1982. I arranged a meeting with Bill Gates and his partner, Paul Allen, at Microsoft's HQ.

My 5 collaborators refused to share royalties and/or profits from the manufacture of dark matter motor/generators with anyone other than the 6 of us. I knew that the work was not going to be completed and turned into an actual invention until I could solve the problem of back EMF and eddy current stopping of the dark matter motor/generator machine – less than a millionth of a second after it was turned on. Temporarily stymied, I set the invention work aside, and went to California.

Then, in early 2001, I was sitting in the Veteran's Administration Hospital in Los Angeles. I saw a front page article in the Los Angeles Times concerning dark energy and dark matter research. It inspired me. So while I waited at the pharmacy to pick up medications I needed as a result of having been gifted by 4 strokes and a few TIAs, the solution to the invention of a dark matter motor flashed into my damaged brain. I had instantly solved the back EMF and eddy current problems. I had lived to invent the most important invention ever, the dark matter motor.

From that day until this, I slog through the problems of trying to convince people that the work of the greatest scientist in the history of this planet must give way, to the work of a long-retired dairy farmer and goat herder.

Moving Forward

Some 33 years ago I realized that it may be possible to harness permanent magnets to generate energy; energy that could be converted into electrical current to light cities as well as provide horsepower to operate vehicles.

I've done much research over the past three decades which culminated in my building a prototype motor which uses magnets in a simple, yet apparently undiscovered means. Although not fully completed and tested to date due to lack of funding, I was able to establish through rigorous rudimentary experimentation that one can generate abundant mechanical energy directly from permanent magnets.

This may be hard to believe, but it should not be: after all we are able to use gravity, which like magnetism is a mysterious "free" force in our universe. Gravity is harnessed by damming rivers and then allowing water to free fall through hydroelectric turbines to generate electricity.

My discovery and invention (which now has a patent pending) instead harnesses magnetic energy in this manner: much like an internal combustion engine with pistons that move due to an outside force (ignited gasoline), my motor's pistons move up and down, however solely due to magnetism. Specifically, my pistons are made of very powerful, (commercial-grade) permanent magnets which move upwards due to magnetic attraction toward a low-voltage electromagnet being switched on with opposite polarity atop the piston's cylinder. The piston magnet moves the distance and would collide with the electromagnet save for its polarity being reversed a split second prior to doing so. The reversed polarity then causes the magnetic piston to be repelled downwards. Electronically switching the electromagnet's polarity back and forth moves the pistons up and down, generating abundantly useful mechanical energy.

The electromagnet is initially battery powered. Once the magnetic pistons are in motion, more energy is generated than consumed which for example can rotate a driveshaft causing a vehicle to move, or the output mechanical energy can be converted into electric current to power anything else.

Permanent magnets remain permanent, much like gravity never wears down resulting in objects failing to fall toward a heavier mass. Such a magnetic motor, short of its bearings wearing out, would in theory run forever, needing only an initial outside force to kick start.

In my independently scientifically documented testing, completed in March of 2003, I was able to demonstrate the validity of my magnetic motor's basic principles. A fixed-positioned, low-voltage electromagnet will cause a permanent magnet to move toward it when switched on, even though the electromagnet has far less magnetic force. Interestingly also, a permanent magnet piston will move toward the weaker electromagnet a greater distance than a nonmagnetic iron piston of identical dimensions and weight, which one can conclude means a permanent magnet apparently lends its own energy to its own motion.

Electric current today is generated by moving a conductor through the magnetic field generated by two opposed permanent magnets. Electricity is induced to flow through the conductor as a result. So we've been harnessing magnetic energy all along to create electricity. However instead of building hydroelectric dams or burning coal to generate steam to cause a conductor to move back and forth through a magnetic field, my invention moves magnets directly, harnessing their natural and intrinsic attractive and repelling motion. It is that simple.

For complete details of the tests conducted, the patent application, drawing specs, as well as my personal theories as to why magnets have "free" power one can put to practical use, read my Dark Matter Motor patent application file.

The name I chose for this invention indicates my personal theory of the relationship between the "dark matter" of physics and magnetism, however this is not proven. In any case, the energy within a magnet can be taken advantage of as described here.

I seek professionals in the appropriate fields to test my theories, redo my tests and prove me right or wrong. If such testing demonstrates there is merit to my discovery, the next step is to continue where personal funding has not permitted, to build and test a magnetic motor prototype as detailed in the patent application file available on this website.

Although I anticipate remuneration for my invention, I also recognize that if what I have discovered is true, its ramifications and importance far exceed personal gain. I am sure that I do not have to spell it out for you, the reader: I am talking about the planet becoming free from polluting and radioactive fuels, the solution to global warming, and many other ramifications. I also feel strongly that the only means to ensure this discovery realizes its full potential is to widely disseminate its existence.

Thank you for taking the time to read this. I think it is important. Perhaps you will too.