Sunday, April 3, 2011

Some Shoulders That I Stood On ...

Cosmological Construct Theory Historical Perspective

5 comments:

  1. Judge Honorable Enrique Romero, found, Plaintiff’s primary expert, David R. Sannes (who labels himself a construction engineer) testimony to be “UNBELIEVABLE, EXAGGERATED, FANTASTICAL, UNREAL, INVENTED, FICTIONAL AND UNTRUSTWORTHY.” ‘A DOG AND PONY’ SHOW WITH NO SUBSTANCE.
    Case Title: Hoang, Pltf. V. Pardee Homes, Defendant - Demand for $1,793,000.00
    Pltfs. Counsel: Edward C. Ip & David Sire. Jr.
    Type of incident/Cause: Negligence/construction defect, morphed into general construction defect claim regarding mold and allegations that every aspect of construction was illegal & improper.
    VERDICT: DEFENSE (Hoang) TAKE NOTHING – Trial length/cost to taxpayers OVER 1 year of motion hearings- SEE BELOW website.
    www.sddl.org/sddlupdate/SDDL%202010%20Winter%20Final.pdf

    ReplyDelete
  2. The author has no education to support his comments. He cant do the math. He doesn't lecture. He doesn't write articles that are published (other than on his blog). Does read article about subject he professes to be an expert on. What he can do is talk at length on subjects most people don't know about and seem intelligent.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Mostly true. This was an arbitration case so the public did not have to foot the bill. And judge said all that and more about Sannes. Sannes testimony was a joke, but the real blame for the mess was Mr. Edward C. Ip. Ip should have pull he head out of dark places and realized Sannes for who Sannes is--more mouth than substance.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Sannes, looks like you have new fans! Please call Steve White at 818 998-0025. Long time no talk......glad to see your doing well these days.

    ReplyDelete
  5. "NUTTIER THAN A FRUITCAKE TOTAL RUBBISH, NONSENSICAL RAVINGS Sannes has no college degree he has no certifiable credentials as a construction forensic engineer or in field of construction how he has been allowed to testify in court as an expert witness in these fields makes a mockery of the court system and the gullible judges that believe in his "more mouth than substance" What is astounding is the lawyers don't ask for credentials, certification or licenses do they even research the California state license that verifies Sannes holds no such licenses for these fields. Not licensed in California nor Seattle nor Oregon. Folks read his FBI Dirty Wars it exposes him for what he really is a CON MAN
    "Sannes states he would not put his life on the line by becoming and FBI undercover agent for money"

    ReplyDelete