The History of the Dark Matter Motor

Einstein, in 1917, mathematically calculated that a heretofore totally unknown entity, dark energy, had to permeate the universe. Why? Because dark energy had to be omnipresent in the universe, as a lambda notation, in order to make the mathematics of his general relativity theory coherent.

As I would describe it, the compulsive force of gravity had to be balanced by the equal and opposite repulsive force of dark energy. Why? Because Einstein's postulation of a cosmological constant (a force that opposes gravity and keeps the universe from collapsing) would maintain the then consensus belief that the universe was static and eternal.

Then Hubble discovered that the "Nebula" Andromeda was not just an interstellar cloud of dust and gas, in the Milky Way. It was another, and second, galaxy – started to create doubts. Then Hubble discovered that the universe is expanding, and that really caused trouble.

Andromeda and the Milky Way were just two of a great number of galaxies (that, at the time of this paper, number more than 1,453,000,000). So, in 1928, Einstein repudiated his own dark energy cosmological constant.

By 1960, I concluded that Einstein's "biggest blunder" was to denounce his cosmological constant. Of course, I was just then a high school student, a dairy farmer and a part-time goat herder.

Notwithstanding that truth, there was a huge obvious truth – the mathematics of Einstein's general relativity were not coherent, absent the repulsive force of dark energy. So, like any other eclecticist autodidact, I decided to solve Einstein's problems with the mathematics of general relativity.

Since I was oblivious to the enormity of this task that I had set for myself, I set out with complete confidence to discern if anyone, other than Einstein, had concluded that "dark energy" existed in the universe.

Less that 1,000 hours of mind-boggling work later, I had found the 1933 work of Fritz Swicky. Swicky (utilizing the 103 inch Hooker Telescope on Mount Wilson – which was then under the control of Edwin Hubble) had studied a local group of galaxies. Swicky concluded that this local group of galaxies was rotating around the center of the galaxy at a speed many more times than was dictated by their observable masses, according to the then accepted principles of physics and astronomy. Swicky postulated that this "missing" mass had to be composed of "dark matter."

Swicky's work fascinated me because he had also developed superior bomb-making materials for the military forces of the United States. I, of course, as a bomb-maker since the age of 12, tended to endorse Swicky's "dark matter" conclusions.

My research into the "dark matter' conclusions of Swicky also led me to the conclusion that Einstein never adopted the conclusions of Swicky before his death in 1955. I also noted that many of Swicky's colleagues judged him to be mentally unstable.

Then I found that the astronomer, Jan Oort, had also concluded that the orbital velocities of stars in the Milky Way did not decrease (in accordance with Keplerian rules of motion) as they were located at increasing distances from the center of our galaxy. But, as I recall, his results simply led Oort to conclude that his observational discrepancies would be rectified by future developments in astronomy.

After this uncontradicted research, I made it my working hypothesis that the dark energy of Einstein, the dark matter of Swicky and the dark matter of Oort were consistent and reliable.

My working conclusion was that: 1) there was a reason that the orbital velocities of stars did not decrease (in accordance with Keplerian rules of motion) as they were located at increasing distances from the center of the Milky Way galaxy; 2) the "Schwarzschild Solution" just furnished increasingly closer approximations of an actual precise mathematical solution, which has yet to be discovered. I believe that the Skyler particle that I have postulated in my Theory Of Everything will lead to the calculations that eliminate the need for the " Schwarzschild Solution"; 3) as Einstein had postulated that light was carried by a particle, so was the repulsive "dark energy" that he mathematically derived in 1917, as the counterbalance to the force of centrifugal gravity throughout the universe; 4) this repulsive centrifugal force that balances both Newtonian gravity and "attraction unique to general relativity" had to be composed of a particle and a wave. That particle and wave I have named the Skyler Particle/Wave; and 5) I had found why the mathematics of general relativity do not make sense at a quantum level.

I eventually had created conclusive evidence by creating the dark matter motor/generator prototype machine.

I then turned to the study of everyone involved in electricity and magnetism. Before I volunteered to serve in the U.S. Army in 1965, I had exhaustively studied the nature and source of compulsive and repulsive forces of permanent magnets. I scoured every scientific reference to the source of the energy of permanent magnets. My work just obtained completely unsatisfactory results. My favorite words about this research came from a physics textbook, coauthored by a Nobel Prize winning physicist, who wrote: "The permanent magnet is the source of energy of a unique kind."

In February, 1968, I returned from three combat tours in Vietnam for the U.S. Army and the National Security Agency. On February 17, 1968, I was hired by Boeing as an aeronautical engineer in Boeing's multi-disciplined engineering group of last resort.

I was named Boeing's engineer of the month, for February, 1968.

Within seven months of being hired by Boeing, I reported only to a committee of Boeing's board of directors, and to Malcolm Stamper, Boeing's CEO, and was being paid an outrageous sum of money.

In 1969, I solved the problem of utilizing weak electromagnets to alternatively combine with powerful permanent magnets, in rotary and piston configurations, to multiply the input energy as output energy, and work.

So, in 1969, I first contacted one of Seattle's finest intellectual property lawyers, Richard Seed. Mr. Seed believed in my dark matter motor/generator concepts, but he told me that
I would play hell in selling my inventions, because they defied many of the most famous laws of accepted science.

Richard Seed arranged a meeting for me, with a man whose inventive genius created the frozen food aisles.

Richard Seed arranged for me to talk with a successful inventor, Edward Maher. Mr. Maher had spent a lot of years of study and work before he sold his first invention, fish sticks. Maher graduated from Harvard with a degree in chemistry. He worked for General Foods. Fish sticks are lightly battered, cooked, partially dehydrated, flash frozen food – that kept its spices fresh by preserving them in butter. The cell walls of the fish were not mush, when thawed out by pan frying, because of the partial dehydration. Maher's work led to the huge frozen food sections in supermarkets today.

Mr. Maher told me that after the success of fish sticks, he got countless offers to make money.

Early in 1970, my scientific research, and my building design and construction work, were interrupted. Just before I had completed work on the District, a very large nightclub, a few blocks from the University of Washington, a powerful bomb exploded at a post office a few blocks away.

As a former senior counterintelligence agent back from bomb building work in Vietnam, I decided to solve the bombing mystery and bring the bombers to justice.

Meantime, in the early 1970's, Vera Rubin, of the Carnegie Institute, was telescopically observing and plotting the velocity of stars. Rubin found that velocities of stars did not decrease with increasing distance from galactic centers. Her work defied the Keplerian motion previously proven by all earlier astronomers, except for Swicky and Oort.

Rubin's star velocity plots demonstrated that the 60 or so stars, whose speed she plotted, did not exhibit speed decreases inversely proportional to the square root of radius distances – as required by Newton's law of gravity, and Kepler's Laws.

In 1974, Rubin's definitively plotted observation of stars' speeds led her to examine the telescopic observations and conclusions of Fritz Swicky in 1933. Vera Rubin, as of this date, has not publicly argued against the conclusion of dark matter proposed by Swicky.

Also, in 1974, Peebles and Ostriker, at Princeton University, had published a theoretical argument for the presence of dark matter in the universe.

Thus, Einstein, Swicky, Oort, Rubin, Peebles and Ostriker all had inadvertently brought dark energy and dark matter to the forefront of astrophysical research.

In 1981 and 1982, the actual construction and preliminary testing of my prototype dark matter motor proved that my 5 collaborators and myself had tapped what Tesla called: "the very wheelhouse of the universe."

My collaborators and I ran out of money, in early 1982. I arranged a meeting with Bill Gates and his partner, Paul Allen, at Microsoft's HQ.

My 5 collaborators refused to share royalties and/or profits from the manufacture of dark matter motor/generators with anyone other than the 6 of us. I knew that the work was not going to be completed and turned into an actual invention until I could solve the problem of back EMF and eddy current stopping of the dark matter motor/generator machine – less than a millionth of a second after it was turned on. Temporarily stymied, I set the invention work aside, and went to California.

Then, in early 2001, I was sitting in the Veteran's Administration Hospital in Los Angeles. I saw a front page article in the Los Angeles Times concerning dark energy and dark matter research. It inspired me. So while I waited at the pharmacy to pick up medications I needed as a result of having been gifted by 4 strokes and a few TIAs, the solution to the invention of a dark matter motor flashed into my damaged brain. I had instantly solved the back EMF and eddy current problems. I had lived to invent the most important invention ever, the dark matter motor.

From that day until this, I slog through the problems of trying to convince people that the work of the greatest scientist in the history of this planet must give way, to the work of a long-retired dairy farmer and goat herder.